To the tumor and beyond: Tales of a holistic miRNA delivery vehicle

Like the challenges and skepticism that faced the antibody therapeutics field over a decade ago, RNA therapeutics is facing the same. And, like the antibody therapeutics field, we are beginning to realize the clinical impact of RNA therapeutics amiss these challenges. This is most clearly highlighted with the recent approval of mRNA vaccines to prevent against SARS-CoV-2 and the first FDA approved RNAi drugs targeted to the liver. Unfortunately, RNA-based drugs targeted to cancer cells is lagging behind, even with countless years of work that has revealed the power of using RNAi for treating oncological diseases. Lack of success in this space is attributed to inability to deliver RNAi safely and effectively. A successful delivery agent requires multiple features. First, the agent must deliver the RNA specifically to the intended cells. Second, the agent must have a large therapeutic window, meaning that toxicity, if observed, should occur at doses that are orders of magnitude higher than the therapeutic dose. Third, if delivery of the RNA is by way of a specific ligand and receptor pair, as is the case herein, the RNA must successfully escape the endosome. Simply swelling the endosome is not enough if noncovalent interactions between the ligand and the receptor cannot be disrupted. Fourth, the RNA should include appropriate stabilizing modifications to increase intracellular half-life that will reduce dosing and cost. Through hard work and dedication in this space, we have come up with an inclusive, easily synthesized, intramolecular molecule that achieves all of these essential features. Moreover, the ligand used to achieve successful delivery is also being evaluated for imaging tumors localized in the central nervous system. Here, the challenges we face, the hurdles we have overcome, and the barriers that still remain to achieve success in revealing the clinical potential of miRNA as anti-cancer therapeutics will be presented.

Real-World Single-Centre Experience of Jak Inhibitor Use in Ra

Background/Aims The use of Janus Kinase Inhibitors (JAKi) has been gradually increasing overtime in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other inflammatory arthritis and these appeal to patients. being oral agents. Nevertheless, rheumatologists have become cautious about their use since recent trials have shown safety concerns about VTEs, MACE and malignancies. Methods We decided to study use of JAKi at our centre in Princess of Wales Hospital Bridgend. The aim was to assess whether appropriate patients were selected (considering cautions about MACE, VTEs and malignancies). We also wanted to see whether all patients had required pretreatment safety testing and post-treatment monitoring performed. Results These were 70 patients;59 were females and 11 were males. All of them were diagnosed as RA. Average age was 61.1 years (20-85), average duration of disease 129.9 months (16-340) and average duration of treatment was 58.1 weeks. The most common JAKi being used was baricitinib (84%) followed by tofacitinib (12%) and upadacitinib (4%). 50% patient were on concomitant csDMARDs among whom two-thirds were on methotrexate. Looking at previous biologic use, 9 patients were biologic naive, 22 had one biologic, 15 had two biologics used in the past. All patients were appropriately selected (severe RA and no significant risk factors for MACE, VTEs and malignancies). All patients had pre-treatment Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, latent TB, FBC and LFTs checked. All patients had FBC and LFTs monitored post treatment. No patient developed VTE, MACE or cancer on treatment. 84.2% patients had lipids tested before starting JAKi. 22.8% patients had abnormal lipids before Rx initiation and 62.5% of these were on lipid lowering Rx. All patients had lipids tested post treatment, but the timing was quite variable and only 62.5% of patients had lipids tested on the recommended time. There were 2 deaths recorded in this cohort. One of those was an 80-year-old RA patient on baricitinib 2mg OD, who died due to chest infection on the background of ILD. He was not on steroids or csDMARDs. The second patient was 63 years' old (on baricitinib 4mg OD), and died due to respiratory sepsis, and was also on azathioprine. She had RA with advanced ILD. The reasons for discontinuing JAKi were inefficacy (46%), side effects (39%) and both inefficacy and side effects (15%). 41.4%of patient experienced side effects due to JAKi. These included infection 28%, deranged lipids 17%, cytopenia 14%, deranged LFTs 14%, GI side effects 10%, skin rash 7% and varicella zoster 3%. Conclusion There has been steady increase in the use of tsDMARDs for RA and other rheumatic conditions. Due to short half-life, these drugs became a popular choice during COVID-19 pandemic but on the other hand safety monitoring became extremely challenging during this time.

An Emerging Role of Interferon Targeted Therapy in Mucocutaneous Sle: A Prospective Real-World Evaluation of Anifrolumab for Refractory Cutaneous Lupus

Background/Aims Advances in rational drug design and recent clinical trials are leading to emergence of a range of novel therapies for SLE and therapeutic options in clinical practice are expected to broaden rapidly. The optimal real-world place of emerging and established agents will be guided by understanding their differential efficacy on specific SLE manifestations as well as efficacy for more resistant disease. Anifrolumab, a type-I interferon receptor blocking monoclonal antibody, showed efficacy in SLE in phase III trials with a notable effect on mucocutaneous disease although specific lesion subtypes and chroncicity were not explored. Severe refractory mucocutaneous SLE such as scarring discoid lesions are an important and common clinical challenge in current practice. We therefore prospectively evaluated the real-world efficacy and quality of life impact of anifolumab for active mucocutaneous SLE, recalcitrant to multiple biologic and immunosuppressant therapies. Methods Seven patients commenced anifrolumab (300mg by monthly iv infusion) following application to the manufacturer's early access programme (NCT 04750057). Prior biologic therapies were discontinued at least 5 half-lives in advance. Mucocutaneous disease activity was captured by Cutaneous Lupus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) activity score and medical photography. Patient reported health-related quality of life comprising the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI);Lupus-QoL and EQ5D-5L were evaluated at baseline, three and six months. Results Seven female patients with active mucocutaneous SLE (Discoid LE n=5, chilblain LE n=1, subacute cutaneous LE n=1) and median disease duration of 17 years were evaluated. Median baseline CLASI activity score was 17 (range 10-26;higher scores indicating severe disease). Median number of previously failed therapies was 7 and included rituximab in 6/7, belimumab in 2/7 and thalidomide in 4/7. Rapid resolution of scale and erythema in DLE was established within 1 month of anifrolumab treatment. Improvements to chilblain lupus were evident by three months. CLASI activity score was improved >=75% in all patients at 3 months. Clinical responses were associated with significant improvements in DLQI (p<0.001) and EQ5D-VAS (p=0.002) by three months. Lupus-QoL trended toward improvement across all domains but most strongly for fatigue (p=0.01) and pain (p=0.002) by 6 months. One patient discontinued treatment after 4 months due to polydermatomal shingles complicated by sensorineural hearing loss. Infection coincided with background prednisolone dose >15mg daily, recent COVID-19 infection and new on-treatment hypogammaglobulinaemia (IgG <5g/L). Prolonged aciclovir treatment was required for lesion resolution. Conclusion We report rapid real-world efficacy and quality of life impact of anifrolumab on highly refractory mucocutaneous SLE, which exceeded that anticipated from existing clinical trial data. Findings suggest a unique role for emerging interferon targeting therapies in management of mucocutaneous SLE but emphasize need for enhanced VZV precautions among higher risk patients.

Rising level of pulmonary dioxin might trigger CMV and HSV-1 reactivation via bHLH/PAS/AhR:ARNT transcription pathway in lungs of immunocompetent COVID-19 patients with ARDS

Study objective. It has been shown that human common viruses are new target genes for host cell dioxin receptor transcriptional (AhR-ARNT) complex initially proven to up-regulate mammalian genes containing dioxin-response elements (DRE) in the promoters [doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2012.05.265]. Initially, transactivation of HIV-1 and HBV by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlodibenzop- dioxin (TCDD) at low nanomolar range was demonstrated [doi:10.3109/00498259309057034]. Noteworthy, transactivation of human cytomegalovirus (CMV) was shown with 0.3 ppt dioxin, i.e. lower than its current background level in the general population (~3.0 ppt). Recently, reactivation of CMV infection was found to influence worse clinical outcome following SARS-CoV-2 infection (doi: 10.1186/s12979-020- 00185-x). Other findings showed that CMV and herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) reactivation were observed in immunocompetent patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03252-3). Addressing occurrence of Herpesviridae reactivation in severe COVID-19 patients, and still unspecified real triggers of CMV and HSV-1 reactivations, we tested TCDD, which current body burden (DBB) ranges from 20 pg/g (TEQ in fat) in general population to 100 pg/g in older people. Methods. In Silico quantitation of active DRE in promoters of viral genes. Virus DNA hybridization assay. Clinical and epidemiological analyses. Results and Discussion. In this study, a computational search for DRE in CMV and HSV-1 genes was performed by SITECON, a tool recognizing potentially active transcriptional factor binding sites. In silico analysis revealed in regulatory region of CMV IE genes from 5 to 10 DRE, and from 6 to 8 DRE in regulatory region of HSV-1 IE genes.We established that a low picomolar TCDD can trigger up-regulation of CMV and HSV-1 genes via AhR:Arnt transcription factor in macrophage(doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijid.2012.05.265) and glial human cell lines (doi.org/10.1016/j. jalz.2016.06.1268), respectively. In fact, viral reactivation may be triggered in COVID-19 ARDS patients by higher pulmonary TCDD concentrations, because "lipid storm" within lungs of severe COVID-19 patients has been recently reported (doi.org/ 10.1101/2020.12.04.20242115). TCDD is known as the most potent xenobiotic, which bioaccumulates and has estimation half-life in humans of up to 10 yr. Due to hydrophobic character (Log P octanol/water: 7.05), TCDD partitions into inflammatory lipids in lung tissue thus augmenting its local concentration. Population-based epidemiological data on SARS-CoV-2 first wave of pandemic revealed high level of CMV seropositivity and cumulative mortality rate 4.5 times in Lombardi region of Italy, where after Seveso industrial accident TCDD plasma level in pre-exposed subjects is 15 times the level in rest of Italy (doi. org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.620416). Also, Arctic Native (AN) peoples consume dioxin-contaminated fat in seafood and have TCDD DBB, i.e. 7 times that in general population. To the point of this paper, their COVID-19 mortality is 2.2 times of that among non-AN Alaskans (doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6949a3). Conclusion(s): TCDD in the picomolar range may trigger CMV expression in lung cells and commit virus to the lytic cycle, which can be applied to reactivation of Herpesviridae infection in immunocompetent patients with COVID-19 ARDS syndrome.Copyright © 2023 The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Safety and Pharmacokinetics of a Novel Double Prodrug Asc10 in Healthy Subjects

Background: ASC10 is an oral double prodrug of the active antiviral ribonucleoside analog, ASC10-A (also known as beta-d-N4-hydroxycytidine), which is a potent inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2. ASC10 is rapidly metabolized into ASC10-A in vivo after oral dosing. Here, we report the results of the first-in-human, phase 1 study to determine the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of ASC10 in healthy subjects, and to assess the food effect on the pharmacokinetics. Method(s): This study included 2 parts. Part 1 (multiple-ascending-dose) consisted of 6 cohorts (8 or 12 subjects per cohort). Eligible subjects were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to receive either twice-daily (BID) doses of 50 to 800 mg ASC10 or placebo for 5.5 days, and were then followed for 7 days for safety. In Part 2 (food effect), 12 subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either 800 mg ASC10 in the fed state followed by 800 mg in the fasted state, or vice versa, with a 7-day washout period between doses. PK blood samples were collected and measured for ASC10-A along with ASC10 and molnupiravir. Safety assessments included monitoring of adverse events (AEs), measurement of vital signs, clinical laboratory tests, and physical examinations. Result(s): ASC10-A was the major circulating metabolite ( >99.94%) in subjects after oral dosing of ASC10. ASC10-A appeared rapidly in plasma, with a median Tmax of 1.00 to 2.00 h, and declined with a geometric t1/2 of approximately 1.10 to 3.04 h. After multiple dosing for 5.5 days, both Cmax and AUC of ASC10-A increased in a dose-proportional manner from doses of 50 to 800 mg BID without accumulation. of ASC10-A in the fed state occurred slightly later, with a median of 3.99 h postdose versus 2.00 h (fasted state). However, Cmax and AUC were very similar or the same between fed and fasted states. Thus, administration of ASC10 with food is unlikely to have an effect on exposure. The incidence of AEs was similar between subjects receiving ASC10 or placebo (both 66.7%) and 95.0% of AEs were mild. There were no serious adverse events as well as no clinically significant findings in clinical laboratory, vital signs, or electrocardiography. Conclusion(s): Results of this study showed that ASC10 was well tolerated, and the increase in plasma exposure of ASC10-A was dose proportional across the range of doses tested with no accumulation and no food effect. 800 mg ASC10 BID is selected for further studies in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2.

A PHASE 1B STUDY OF ZOTATIFIN FOR THE TREATMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE COVID (PROpel)

Background: Zotatifin (eFT226) is a potent and selective inhibitor of eukaryotic initiation factor 4A (eIF4A), a host RNA helicase required for SARS-CoV-2 replication. In vitro, zotatifin demonstrates broad spectrum antiviral activity against all human coronaviruses tested. Zotatifin has physicochemical and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties suitable for convenient, single subcutaneous (sc) injection. This study assessed the safety, antiviral activity, and PK of zotatifin in non-hospitalized patients (pts) with mild/moderate COVID. Method(s): PROPEL is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study in non-hospitalized pts with mild/moderate COVID. At randomization, pts must have had a SARS-CoV-2 positive test within 7 days and at least 1 COVID symptom. Pts were randomized (3:1) to zotatifin or placebo sc in 3 cohorts of 12 pts each. Cohort 1, 2 and 3 received a single dose (SD) of zotatifin of 0.01. 0.02 and 0.035 mg/kg or matching placebo. Safety (adverse event (AE) and laboratory tests), antiviral activity (mid-turbinate nasal swabs and saliva), and plasma PK were collected over 30 days. The primary endpoint was safety;key secondary endpoints included SARS-CoV-2 viral load (VL) and PK. The study was not powered for statistical inferential testing. Result(s): 36 pts were enrolled across all three cohorts and completed a 30-day follow up. Data is currently available for pts in cohorts 1 and 2, 18 and 6 of whom received zotatifin and placebo, respectively. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The most common AE was erythema at injection site in cohort 1 (44%) and cohort 2 (89%), vs. 0% in the zotatifin and pooled placebo groups, respectively. Other AE frequencies were comparable between zotatifin and placebo and no serious AEs were reported. The concentrationtime profile of zotatifin from cohorts 1 and 2 following sc administration was similar to that reported previously following IV administration, demonstrated a terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) of ~ 4 days, high steady-state volume of distribution (Vss) of 31 L/kg, and low plasma clearance (Cl) of 3.9 mL/min/kg. A faster time to viral RNA undetectability was observed with zotatifin vs. placebo (see Fig 1. Not statistically significant). Conclusion(s): Zotatifin was safe, well tolerated and demonstrated a trend in clinical antiviral activity in patients with mild to moderate COVID which supports further clinical development. Zotatifin sc route of administration supports a point of care treatment for COVID.

Pharmacokinetics Informs Remdesivir Dosing for Patients with Severe Renal Impairment

Background: Despite renal impairment (RI) being a risk factor for severe COVID-19, there are no approved antiviral treatment options for patients with severely impaired kidney function (eGFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or kidney failure) in the US. At the time remdesivir (RDV) was initially approved for the treatment of COVID-19, the impact of renal impairment (RI) on pharmacokinetics (PK) of RDV, its metabolites, and the excipient, sulfobutylether beta-cyclodextrin sodium (SBECD), was not known. Method(s): Here, we report the PK data supporting dosing of RDV in COVID-19 patients with severely impaired kidney function. PK samples for RDV and metabolites (GS-704277, GS-441524) were collected in the Phase 3 REDPINE study in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with severely impaired kidney function. Participants in this double-blind study were randomized 2:1 to intravenous (IV) remdesivir (200 mg on Day 1, then 100 mg daily up to Day 5) or IV saline as placebo-to-match. SBECD PK was analyzed in a phase 1 study in non-COVID-19 participants with normal kidney function, mild and moderate RI who received 100 mg dose of remdesivir (containing 3000 mg SBECD). The population PK analysis included observations from healthy and COVID-19 patients with full range of renal function across all adult studies. Result(s): Geometric mean exposures (AUCtau) observed in REDPINE Study as compared to PINETREE Study increased up to 553% for the GS-441524 metabolite (dependent on renal elimination) and to a lesser degree GS-704277 (294%, minor renal elimination) and RDV (78.9%;an increase explained by factors other than renal function, namely, hospitalization and body weight) (Table 1). The increased PK exposures were not associated with new safety signals in this study (n=163 remdesivir, n=80 placebo). Population PK analysis identified baseline eGFR as a significant covariate for GS-704277 and GS-441524 clearance, but not for RDV itself. SBECD PK was characterized by short half-life (t1/2) (1.6 hours in normal renal function to 3.8 hours in moderate RI) and fast plasma clearance (7.9 L/h in normal renal function). Analysis of SBECD in severe RI (REDPINE) is ongoing, but accumulation is not expected based on its observed short plasma t1/2. Conclusion(s): Given the observed PK and the absence of any new safety signals associated with increased metabolite levels in patients with severely impaired kidney function, no dose adjustment is recommended for RDV in COVID-19 patients with eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, regardless of the need for dialysis.

Stability of SARS-CoV-2 on inanimate surfaces: A review.

The stability of SARS-CoV-2 for varying periods on a wide range of inanimate surfaces has raised concerns about surface transmission; however, there is still no evidence to confirm this route. In the present review, three variables affecting virus stability, namely temperature, relative humidity (RH), and initial virus titer, were considered from different experimental studies. The stability of SARS-CoV-2 on the surfaces of six different contact materials, namely plastic, metal, glass, protective equipment, paper, and fabric, and the factors affecting half-life period was systematically reviewed. The results showed that the half-life of SARS-CoV-2 on different contact materials was generally 2-10 h, up to 5 d, and as short as 30 min at 22 °C, whereas the half-life of SARS-CoV-2 on non-porous surfaces was generally 5-9 h d, up to 3 d, and as short as 4 min at 22 â„ƒ. The half-life on porous surfaces was generally 1-5 h, up to 2 d, and as short as 13 min at 22 °C. Therefore, the half-life period of SARS-CoV-2 on non-porous surfaces is longer than that on porous surfaces, and thehalf-life of the virus decreases with increasing temperature, whereas RH produces a stable negative inhibitory effect only in a specific humidity range. Various disinfection precautions can be implemented in daily life depending on the stability of SARS-CoV-2 on different surfaces to interrupt virus transmission, prevent COVID-19 infections, and avoid over-disinfection. Owing to the more stringent control of conditions in laboratory studies and the lack of evidence of transmission through surfaces in the real world, it is difficult to provide strong evidence for the efficiency of transmission of the contaminant from the surface to the human body. Therefore, we suggest that future research should focus on exploring the systematic study of the entire transmission process of the virus, which will provide a theoretical basis for optimizing global outbreak prevention and control measures.

Trajectory and Demographic Correlates of Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid in Recently Infected Blood Donors, United States.

We evaluated antibodies to the nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV-2 in a large cohort of blood donors in the United States who were recently infected with the virus. Antibodies to the nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV-2 indicate previous infection but are subject to waning, potentially affecting epidemiologic studies. We longitudinally evaluated a cohort of 19,323 blood donors who had evidence of recent infection by using a widely available serologic test to determine the dynamics of such waning. We analyzed overall signal-to-cutoff values for 48,330 donations (average 2.5 donations/person) that had an average observation period of 102 days. The observed peak signal-to-cutoff value varied widely, but the waning rate was consistent across the range, with a half-life of 122 days. Within the cohort, only 0.75% of persons became seronegative. Factors predictive of higher peak values and longer time to seroreversion included increasing age, male sex, higher body mass index, and non-Caucasian race.

Determining half-life of SARS-CoV-2 antigen in respiratory secretion.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is primarily transmitted from person to person through respiratory droplets and aerosols. It is also possible for the virus to be transmitted indirectly through environmental contamination. The likelihood of environmental transmission depends on several factors, including the survival time of the virus in respiratory secretions. However, the stability of SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory secretions has not been investigated. In this study, we compared the half-life of the SARS-CoV-2 antigen in respiratory secretion under different conditions. We applied respiratory secretion (5 µL) to glass slides, air-dried the slides for 1 h, and kept them at 24 °C or 4 °C for 10 days. Respiratory secretions were also placed in test tubes (sealed to preserve moisture) and in normal saline for 10 days. The concentration of SARS-CoV-2 antigen in all samples was simultaneously measured using colloidal gold immunochromatography, and the half-life of the antigen was calculated. The half-life of the antigen in the wet (sealed tube) and saline samples at room temperature was 5.0 and 2.92 days, respectively. The half-life of the antigen in the air-dried sample at room temperature and at 4 °C was 2.93 and 11.4 days, respectively. The half-life was longer in respiratory secretions than that in normal saline. The half-life was also longer in respiratory secretions, at a lower temperature, and under wet conditions. Therefore, environmental transmission can also play a significant role in the spread of the virus. Robust prevention and control strategies could be developed based on the half-life of the antigen in respiratory secretions.

Appendicular flap transposition in case of the left ureters defects

Introduction & Objectives: The frequency of involvement in the oncological process of the ureters in case of pelvis tumors ranges from 15 to 20%. The use of the appendix as a plastic material for the reconstruction of extended ureteral defects (EUD), including left-sided ones, remains debatable. The main goal of this study is evaluating the clinical and functional results after EUD repair using patchy transposition of the appendix. Material(s) and Method(s): Since August 2019 to June 2021, 8 laparoscopic surgeries were performed to replace the EUD using flap transposition of the appendix. Of these, 6 on the left (75%), 2 on the right (25%). 7 women (87.5%) and 1 man (12.5%) were operated on. Mean age 53+/-10.6 years. Average BMI 25.9 kg/m2. Etiology EUD: 25% radiotherapy (n2), 50% iatrogenic surgery (n4), 12.5% (n1) primary ureteral cancer, 12.5% (n1) non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. In all cases, the first stage was a wide mobilization of the ileocecal angle, the appendix was disconnected with a 45 mm hardware suture, in case of left-sided lesion, the appendix was moved isoperistaltically under the mesentery of the sigmoid colon to the left side after preliminary maximum mobilization of the process on the vascular pedicle in the form of a "triangle". All patients received a 7Fr ureteral stent. CT urography was performed on the 3rd, 7th, 11th days. Dynamic nephroscintigraphy was performed on the 90th day. Result(s): The average length of diastasis is 4.6+/-1.7 cm. The average length of the mobilized appendix was 8+/-1.8 cm. Replacement of the ureter with an appendix and a flap of the bladder according to the Demel method was performed in 1 case (12.5%), according to the Boari method in 1 case (12.5%), in 6 (75%) cases an anastomosis was formed according to the "end-to-end" type. the end". The average duration of the operation was 251+/-40.9 min, blood loss was 121+/-56.7 ml. Median removal of the ureteral stent was 36+/-18.28 days. Duration of hospital stay was 14+/-5.2 days. Median follow-up 10+/-5.3 months. Early complications (<30 days): 2 cases of urinary edema (Clavien-Dindo II), 2 cases of ipsilateral hydronephrosis (Clavien-Dindo I-II). Late complications (>30 days): 1 case of partial failure of ureterocystoanastomosis against the background of Sars-Cov-2 infection (Clavien-Dindo IIIa), 1 case of non-functioning left kidney (Clavien-Dindo IVa). Dynamic nephroscintigraphy was performed in 68.4% of patients, the average isotope accumulation time was 4.23+/-0.25 minutes, the duration of the half-life was 14.26+/-0.52 minutes. Conclusion(s): Flap transposition with the appendix is a technically difficult but possible option for extended ureteral strictures. However, various pathological processes that have developed against the background of previous treatment potentially increase the risk of developing repeated strictures or anastomotic leaks. Therefore, given the small sample of patients, further research on this issue is required.Copyright © 2023.

The Potential Impact of Ayurvedic Traditional Bhasma on SARS-CoV-2-Induced Pathogenesis

The mass casualties caused by the delta variant and the wave of the newer "Omicron" variant of SARS-COV-2 in India have brought about great concern among healthcare officials. The government and healthcare agencies are seeking effective strategies to counter the pandemic. The application of nanotechnology and repurposing of drugs are reported as promising approaches in the management of COVID-19 disease. It has also immensely boomed the search for productive, re-liable, cost-effective, and bio-assimilable alternative solutions. Since ancient times, the traditional-ly employed Ayurvedic bhasmas have been used for diverse infectious diseases, which are now employed as nanomedicine that could be applied for managing COVID-19-related health anomalies. Like currently engineered metal nanoparticles (NPs), the bhasma nanoparticles (BNPs) are also packed with unique physicochemical properties, including multi-elemental nanocrystalline compo-sition, size, shape, dissolution, surface charge, hydrophobicity, and multi-pathway regulatory as well as modulatory effects. Because of these conformational and configurational-based physico-chemical advantages, Bhasma NPs may have promising potential to manage the COVID-19 pandemic and reduce the incidence of pneumonia-like common lung infections in children as well as age-related inflammatory diseases via immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, antiviral, and adju-vant-related properties.Copyright © 2023 Bentham Science Publishers.

Nanotechnology Advancements in the Diagnosis and Prevention of COVID-19: Past and Future

Since the start of the decade, the coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19] pandemic has disrupted the world's healthcare system. Scientists have been engaged to bring about a therapeutic agent to help combat the dreaded disease. Many researchers have shown antivirals such as Remde-sivir and Favipiravir to be effective in the treatment;however, these drugs have a short half-life. Hence, the need for a drug delivery system that could prolong or alter their effect by increasing the potency of antivirals or vaccines has been proposed. Nanotechnology has always been at the fore-front of developing and diagnosing diseases. The idea of which can be borrowed to treat the novel coronavirus. The applicability needs to be vast as the disease has spread, and a fast, reliable, effective therapeutic and diagnostic procedure is the need of the hour. Emphasis on nanotechnology us-age through the intranasal and pulmonary route has been given and various applications have also been discussed in this review.Copyright © 2021 Bentham Science Publishers.

Relationship between Pain, Physical Activity, and Quality of Life in Patients with Haemophilia a and Haemophilia B

Introduction: The extended half-life (EHL) registry was established in 2016 to ascertain the long-term outcomes in patients with HaemophiliaA(HA) and B(HB) receiving replacement therapy. The aim was to quantify disease burden and quality of life at baseline and after switching to EHLs. Method(s): The study is a prospective, observational cohort study that enrolled patients switching EHLs or on standard replacement therapy after informed consent following local ethics approval and was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02938156). The study was paused during the COVID pandemic. Here the baseline results are presented for pain, activity and quality of life and their correlations. Pain evaluation was assessed through the brief pain inventory (BPI) 7-day recall, quality of life by EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ5D5L) and physical activity through the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ). The BPI assess severity of pain and the interference with activities. IPAQ assess physical activity undertaken across a comprehensive set of domains. Three levels of physical activity are used to classify the populations: 'low', 'moderate', and ' high'. Result(s): A total of 231 HA and 97 HB were included in the analysis, of whom 231 had switched to EHL products and 96 were on standard replacement therapy. The levels of Physical Activity were similar between Haemophilia types, with approximately 46%, 32% and 22% of patients reporting high, moderate, and low physical activity, respectively. BPI mean (+/-SD) severity score in HA was 2.86 (+/-2.1), HB 3.24 (+/-2.0);interference score HA 3.22 (+/-2.8), HB 3.09 (+/-2.5), mean EQ5D5L visual analogue scale (VAS) for HA 72.92 (+/-15.5) and HB 71.10 (+/-18.2). Within instruments, IPAQ sub-scores and BPI average scores were highly correlated. Between instruments, the strongest linear correlations were seen between theVAS and the BPI scores (R=-0.59, p< 0.0001, n=206 for the average interference score, R=-0.57, p< 0.0001, n=208 for the average pain severity, v.s. the VAS). Correlations between the IPAQ total score and either VAS or BPI scores were weaker, even when limiting to patients with moderate or high activity and using a log scale given the skewed distribution of the IPAQ summary measure. Discussion/Conclusion: The study demonstrates for the first time a strong correlation between pain and quality of life, and weaker correlation between physical activity and quality of life.

Dynamic matching of oxygen uptake kinetics and muscle deoxygenation in post-COVID-19

Recent studies showed that post-COVID-19 patients with reduced pulmonary oxygen uptake (VO2p) kinetics, exhibited a lower peripheral oxygen extraction [lower C(a-v) O2 /Ca O2 ] rather than a central cardiac limitation (supernormal predicted exercisepeak cardiac output), opening further questions of what is impacting VO dynamics. We proposed to investigate the dynamic matching of VO2p , increase of heart rate (HR) and muscle deoxygenation (deoxy[Hb + Mb]) at the onset of heavy-exercise in post-COVID-19 patients. We expected to find a slowness of VO unrelated to circulatory impairment. 12 patients (90 days after onset of symptoms) were compared to 10 healthy controls. The VO rate of change, deoxy[Hb + Mb] in vastus lateralis (by near infrared spectroscopy) and HR were analyzed during a constant work-rate exercise test up to limit of tolerance (~70%peak work-rate). Post-COVID-19 patients had significantly slower VO2p kinetics than controls (Tau-VO2p 52+/-9 vs 40+/-11 seconds(s);p=0,001 and MRT-VO 70+/-12 vs 51+/-10 s;p<0,001). In contrast, t1/2 -HR was faster in patients (65+/-28 vs 85+/-20 s, p=0,04). Not only deoxy[Hb + Mb] dynamics were not accelerated compared to controls, suggesting normal muscle microvascular O2 delivery, but significantly slower (MRT-deoxy[Hb + Mb] 25+/-7 vs 20+/-2 s;p=0,02)(Figure 1). In conclusion, a sluggish on-exercise VO2p in these patients seems unrelated to central and peripheral circulatory adjustments. .

Detection of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus.

The RNA synthesis of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) is a sophisticated process performed by a multilingual viral replication complex, together with cellular factors. A key enzyme of this replication complex is RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp). However, there is limited knowledge about PEDV RdRp. In our present study, a polyclonal antibody against RdRp was prepared by using a prokaryotic expression vector pET-28a-RdRp to study the function of PEDV RdRp and provide a tool to investigate PEDV pathogenesis. In addition, the enzyme activity and half-life of PEDV RdRp were investigated. The result showed that the polyclonal antibody against PEDV RdRp was successfully prepared and was able to be used to detect PEDV RdRp by immunofluorescence and western blotting. Additionally, enzyme activity of PEDV RdRp reached nearly 2 pmol/µg/h and the half-life of PEDV RdRp was 5.47 h.

Loss of anti-spike antibodies following mRNA vaccination for COVID-19 among patients with multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) patients have variable responses to mRNA vaccination to COVID-19. Little is known regarding their vaccine-induced antibody levels over time. METHODS: We monitored spike IgG antibody levels over 24 weeks among a subset of 18 MM patients who showed a full response after two mRNA vaccinations. RESULTS: MM patients had a more rapid decline in antibody levels as compared to eight healthy controls, with power law half-lives of 72 days (vs. 107 days) and exponential half-lives of 37 days (vs. 51 days). The patients with longer SARS-CoV-2 antibody half-lives were more likely to have undetectable monoclonal protein than those with shorter half-lives, suggesting better disease control may correlate with longer duration of vaccine-induced antibodies. Regardless, by 16 weeks post-second dose of mRNA vaccination, the majority of patients had antibody levels below 250 binding arbitrary units per milliliter, which would be unlikely to contribute to preventing COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, even MM patients who respond adequately to vaccination are likely to require more frequent booster doses than the general population.

Evolution of Clinical Phenotypes of COVID-19 Patients During Intensive Care Treatment: An Unsupervised Machine Learning Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Identification of clinical phenotypes in critically ill COVID-19 patients could improve understanding of the disease heterogeneity and enable prognostic and predictive enrichment. However, previous attempts did not take into account temporal dynamics with high granularity. By including the dimension of time, we aim to gain further insights into the heterogeneity of COVID-19. METHODS: We used granular data from 3202 adult COVID patients in the Dutch Data Warehouse that were admitted to one of 25 Dutch ICUs between February 2020 and March 2021. Parameters including demographics, clinical observations, medications, laboratory values, vital signs, and data from life support devices were selected. Twenty-one datasets were created that each covered 24 h of ICU data for each day of ICU treatment. Clinical phenotypes in each dataset were identified by performing cluster analyses. Both evolution of the clinical phenotypes over time and patient allocation to these clusters over time were tracked. RESULTS: The final patient cohort consisted of 2438 COVID-19 patients with a ICU mortality outcome. Forty-one parameters were chosen for cluster analysis. On admission, both a mild and a severe clinical phenotype were found. After day 4, the severe phenotype split into an intermediate and a severe phenotype for 11 consecutive days. Heterogeneity between phenotypes appears to be driven by inflammation and dead space ventilation. During the 21-day period, only 8.2% and 4.6% of patients in the initial mild and severe clusters remained assigned to the same phenotype respectively. The clinical phenotype half-life was between 5 and 6 days for the mild and severe phenotypes, and about 3 days for the medium severe phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: Patients typically do not remain in the same cluster throughout intensive care treatment. This may have important implications for prognostic or predictive enrichment. Prominent dissimilarities between clinical phenotypes are predominantly driven by inflammation and dead space ventilation.

Randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind phase 1 studies of the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of BRII-196 and BRII-198, SARS-CoV-2 spike-targeting monoclonal antibodies with an extended half-life in healthy adults.

Background: BRII-196 and BRII-198 are two anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal neutralizing antibodies as a cocktail therapy for treating COVID-19 with a modified Fc region that extends half-life. Methods: Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of BRII-196 and BRII-198 were investigated in first-in-human, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose phase 1 studies in healthy adults. 44 participants received a single intravenous infusion of single BRII-196 or BRII-198 up to 3,000 mg, or BRII-196 and BRII-198 combination up to 1500/1500 mg, or placebo and were followed up for 180 days. Primary endpoints were incidence of adverse events (AEs) and changes from pre-dose baseline in clinical assessments. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics profiles of BRII-196/BRII-198 and detection of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). Plasma neutralization activities against SARS-CoV-2 Delta live virus in comparison to post-vaccination plasma were evaluated as exploratory endpoints. Results: All infusions were well-tolerated without systemic or local infusion reactions, dose-limiting AEs, serious AEs, or deaths. Most treatment-emergent AEs were isolated asymptomatic laboratory abnormalities of grade 1-2 in severity. BRII-196 and BRII-198 displayed pharmacokinetics characteristic of Fc-engineered human IgG1 with mean terminal half-lives of 44.6-48.6 days and 72.2-83.0 days, respectively, with no evidence of interaction or significant anti-drug antibody development. Neutralizing activities against the live virus of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant were maintained in plasma samples taken on day 180 post-infusion. Conclusion: BRII-196 and BRII-198 are safe, well-tolerated, and suitable therapeutic or prophylactic options for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov under identifiers NCT04479631, NCT04479644, and NCT04691180.